Relational Art in the Time of Tech Oligarchy

In a convulsing world with dwindling digital spaces for connection, can Relational Art offer lessons on building community and meaning?
Donald Nienow · about 1 month ago · 3 minutes read


```html

Reconnecting in a Fractured World: Relational Art Then and Now

The Birth of Relational Aesthetics

Picture this: 1996. The Berlin Wall's collapse still reverberates, leaving a world grappling with uncertainty. Into this fractured landscape steps Nicolas Bourriaud with his groundbreaking exhibition, Traffic. Bourriaud's radical idea? Only temporary art installations, mirroring the ever-shifting status quo, could forge meaning by uniting spectator and experience.

This marked the dawn of "Relational Aesthetics," a revolutionary concept challenging the traditional solitary museum experience. Bourriaud and the Traffic artists declared: in times of upheaval, collective experience itself becomes art.

A Modern Reimagining of Connection

Fast forward to today. Artist and scholar Craig Smith revisits this vital movement in his 2024 book, Relational Art: A Guided Tour. Smith provides a timely exploration of a world, then and now, seeking connection, community, and meaning within temporary spaces.

Our digital age, with its social networks, podcasts, and live streams, forms a kind of ephemeral exhibition space. These digital platforms encourage audience participation and collaborative art creation, echoing what Bourriaud might have called "micro-utopias" in the digital sphere.

However, the rise of misinformation online presents a stark contrast. While platforms like Meta abandon fact-checking, Relational Art projects offer a potent alternative: a pure, transparent space for building meaning and community.

Exploring Interactive Art Experiences

Smith delves into case studies, primarily from the 2000s, examining both "interhuman activity" and "computer-to-human interactivity." He highlights digital art pioneer Peter Halley's Exploding Cell (1996) at MoMA as a seminal example. Viewers manipulated Halley's moving images using a computer mouse, adding their signatures alongside the artist's upon completion.

Smith identifies these peripherals as "interface tools" that empower artist and viewer to co-create "digital aesthetics," showcasing the collaborative potential of technology in art.

Overlooked Pioneers and Critical Reflections

While insightful, Smith's book has its shortcomings. The absence of color images is a significant drawback in an art book. Furthermore, the extensive use of Bourriaud quotes almost warrants an appendix.

A glaring omission is the lack of discussion surrounding foundational Relational Art figures like Rirkrit Tiravanija and Liam Gillick. Tiravanija transformed a gallery into a kitchen, serving free Thai curry and rice, making communal dining an act of art. Gillick's glitter-covered ping-pong table in Traffic encouraged playful interaction and rule-breaking.

A Timeless Message for a Divided World

These artists embody the core spirit of Relational Aesthetics: fostering connection among strangers. In our increasingly polarized world, plagued by division and conflict, this message of interconnectedness resonates deeply.

Smith’s book, despite its flaws, serves as a valuable reminder of how an older artistic movement can speak new truths, offering a potential antidote to our current state of estrangement. Relational Art’s emphasis on connectivity and community provides a powerful lens through which to navigate our troubled times.

```